What you train
- Translating requirements into UI.
- Working with components, state, and edge cases.
- Reading and improving legacy code.
- Giving and receiving code review.
Work with a design system, implement features, maintain legacy, and get reviews from an AI tech lead.
We deliver one connected system: a clear interface, working rules, integrations with your tools, and quality control.
The interface where teams and customers handle requests and tasks.
Rules and statuses that make the process clear and manageable.
Connections to your systems (CRM, 1C, email, etc.) so data is not copied by hand.
Reports and control so you can see delays, errors, and real changes after launch.
We start with one process and one clear outcome. We expand only when the first version truly helps the team.
We map where time is lost, what rules matter, and what goes into the first version.
We agree on scenarios, roles, screens and integrations with your systems.
We build, connect to data, and validate on real tasks from the team.
We measure results, refine details, and expand to nearby processes when it makes sense.
Task: Джун не понимал, как работать с легаси и дизайн‑системой, и часто ломал готовые компоненты.
Solution: Запустили симуляцию с реальными макетами, задачами в трекере, ревью от AI‑лида и багами от QA.
Result: Релиз прошел быстрее, а джун научился читать чужой код и правильно оформлять PR.
How to navigate legacy, processes, and expectations without artificial training projects.
Git flowGit flow without pain: branches, PRs, and conflictsHow to organize branches and PRs so history stays clean and conflicts are resolved faster.
Task breakdownTask decomposition: turn requirements into a clear planA step-by-step approach to breaking down work, estimating risk, and aligning criteria.
APIs, databases, integrations, and engineering discipline.
QAQA simulation: testing, bug reports, and qualityTest cases, bug reports, and team communication.
DevOpsDevOps simulation: CI/CD, infrastructure, and reliabilityPipelines, containers, monitoring, and stability.
Yes, a basic level is required. The simulation trains team workflow, not syntax.
Yes. The tasks include maintaining legacy and fixing issues.
Yes, scenarios are matched to your level, from strong junior to solid mid.
A single scenario can take from a few focused hours to a couple of weeks, depending on task depth, review volume, and your pace.
Yes. The role includes comments, clarifications, reviews, and revisions throughout the scenario, not just a final score.
Yes. The simulation is built around short iterations, so it can fit into a busy schedule and still feel like real workflow.
The platform is in closed beta. Leave a request to get early access and special conditions.